Comments for SCPatriot

Comment on Who is the SCpatriot voting for? by Bruce Littlejohn Boulevard

Bruce Littlejohn Boulevard — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:40:51 +0000

I have endorsed Bill Connor and have contributed to his campaign. However, I was bemused to see Ollie pictured with Bill, had I seen this earlier, I certainly would have questioned the association. Of course Bill can’t help who he’s pictured with or who endorses him….

Comment on Will the Real Nikki Haley Please Stand Up? by Gaye Holt

Gaye Holt — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:55:37 +0000

Great observation on Nikki and her faith Larry. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with all of us.

Comment on Will the Real Nikki Haley Please Stand Up? by Narayanjot Kaur

Narayanjot Kaur — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:27:57 +0000

I am not sure what “idolatry” you are speaking of above? for the record, Sikhism is the world’s 5th largest organized religion, and is monotheistic. The keystone of our faith is that there is one God, the Creator of Everything, who is beyond time, formless, self-existent and does not incarnate (a short version)…..Maybe you were using the idea of “idolatry” in a more metaphoric way….Too often we are cast as off-shoots of the Hindu religion….

Thanks for letting me submit this comment.
Narayanjot Kaur

Comment on The 2nd shot heard ’round the world - your turn… by Elizabeth Moffly

Elizabeth Moffly — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:27:15 +0000

I will be there to meeet and talk with Spartanburg County voters who care about the state of education in SC. Who care about the future well-being of our children and their role in the quality of life in SC. Who care about common-sense leadership from someone who is not part of the system. Who care about a policy / solution that improves the relevancy and quality of education, reduces the drop-out rate, and saves almost half a billion dollars annually without increasing taxes or cutting services. See you there!

Comment on 91.5% of registered voters is the right number by BruceLittlejohnBoulevard

BruceLittlejohnBoulevard — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:12:11 +0000

Yes I always take the opportunity to vote but wonder if my vote counts with Diebold or any other electronic voting machine. Electronic voting machines have been found hackable and there has been more than one state assembly shown the evidence, several tried and convicted of hijacking the counts. Until we return to paper ballots, hand counted in public as called for by the Constitution, I’m not certain I’ll ever have full faith in “voting”. We must return to “Constitutionally recognized voting”

Clinton Curtis Tells of Election Rigging Computer Programs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubyMqONoeqo

Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer for Yang Enterprises (YEI) in Oviedo, Florida until February 2001 and also an ex employee of NASA and Exxon; came forward to testify, before the Ohio US Judiciary, that in 2000, Congressman Tom Feeney and YEI requested Curtis’s assistance to write a program that would rig the vote count on US election machines (most likely used for the 2004 election).

Comment on Forcing Governor Sanford Out by BruceLittlejohnBoulevard

BruceLittlejohnBoulevard — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:25:59 +0000

“Sanford and Sebelius, where are they now?” Think about it. There is waaaay more to this than many recognize.

Comment on Candidates Signing in DNA by Angela

Angela — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:36:41 +0000

Thank you for your ‘WORDS’. I especially appreciate the last one in your article! It really is all about knowing what the person truly believes and having some sort of ‘accountability’. Many may just assume candidates will stand in line with their Party platform. Nevertheless, every person is different and may have differences with a particular issue. However, if that is the case, it shouldn’t be to much to ask that the candidate give their word on what it is they represent, or don’t. If they don’t agree with something in their Parties’ Platform then they ought to tell everyone up front. They also shouldn’t give speeches on such ‘principles and values’ as the “free market” and limited government if they aren’t going to apply them to all areas of our lives (or our childrens). At very least they should read and know their Platform well enough, and also always be the sort of individual to give careful thought before signing something. I can appreciate the founders that didn’t sign (as you mentioned) because they were at least respectful of the weightiness to signing their name to something. They were probably also very conscious of the words they spoke. Truthfully, you can’t preach ‘principles and values’ and then say you know better then applying them because of personal connections you may have, or for any other reason for that matter. Thanks for the historic reminder and for being such a bold and determined Patriot. Thanks you for helping WE THE PEOPLE hear more then just what we are expected to.

Comment on “If the Turban Fits You Must Acquit” and Other Legalese by Angela

Angela — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:36:21 +0000

Sometimes it seems as though some of our own would rather give more rights to admitted terrorists then our own military.

Comment on Forcing Governor Sanford Out by Angela

Angela — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:30:52 +0000

Couldn’t agree with you more Stephen. Although it’s shameful the way that our Party seems willing to stomp on Sanford while he is down in the pits and clearly in need of a hand up. These same guys didn’t listen to him regarding fiscal responsibility and now want to tear at him on this very aspect. Seems like they merely want to degrade everything about him and pile on. Maybe even so they can get it, and stay on this same path. How about our leaders start standing up in the name of forgiveness and all of our other “principles” for that matter. Awesome article by the way! Even the photo encapsulates the perfect image of what is happening. Where are our heroes, that will realize no one of us is perfect and we are all in need of a Savior?

Comment on “If the Turban Fits You Must Acquit” and Other Legalese by mijeel

mijeel — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:31:36 +0000

I’m not a lawyer…but I can, and have, read the U.S. Constitution and the UCMJ…

I was heartened to hear Sen. Lindsey Graham partly hit the nail on the head during the hearing with Attorney General Holder. Sen. Graham rightly pointed out that never in U.S. history have we ever tried an enemy combatant captured on the battlefield in the U.S. civil or criminal court system. I would have liked to have seen Sen. Graham follow up his point with this question: “So, Mr. Attorney General, precisely where in the U.S. Constitution or existing U.S. law do you find the justification for your wrong-headed decision to do this?”

The answer - though the Attorney General will never publicly say it - would be “I made my decision based on international philosophies of jurisprudence.” Like the President, the Attorney General has a distorted view of America, its Constitution, its history, its sovereignty, and its exceptionalism. He merely views the U.S. as one of many countries of equal virtue in the world. Whether you believe it is intentional, the current administration is destroying, not remaking or restoring, America.

Elections have consequences. Sometimes merely annoying…sometimes catastrophic consequences.